Tuesday, July 29th, 2003

Time	Event
11:41a	Sounds Like a Good Idea Tennis being overpowered TUESDAY , 29 JULY 2003 LONDON: Tennis chiefs are exploring ways to save the sport from the bludgeoning brutes of the baseline currently populating the professional ranks. The enormous power and spin provided by hi-tech modern rackets are eliminating subtlety from tennis and sapping the sport of its popularity, leading figures said today. While a return to wooden rackets would mean a backward step for the sport, players wielding smaller weapons could be the key to the future of tennis. A plea to address the problems facing modern tennis was made by a number of former champions during Wimbledon earlier this month. The sport's governing body, the International Tennis Federation, said today it would address the issues endangering the modern game's popularity, in particular the increase in power in the last decade due to advances in tennis racket technology. "We must conserve the game ... the integrity of the game," ITF president Francesco Ricci Bitti said at the International Congress on Tennis Science and Technology in London. "We want to work with the manufacturers to work out what can be done. This is an issue for the future." Former player and current television commentator John Barrett is championing the campaign to curb power and spin in the sport. His call has been backed by former greats including John McEnroe, Martina Navratilova, Boris Becker and Stan Smith. Barrett said exaggerated topspin, as used by most baseliners in the game, was the greatest danger of all to the future of the sport. "Variety is the spice of life," the former British Davis Cup player said. "Diversity is what makes tennis such a wonderful sport. "The baseliner against the serve-volleyer ... that is what people want to see. "But these days what I see is a rather monotonous sport with rallying from the baseline. Something must be done if we are going to restore balance." Barrett and a panel of experts from universities around the world agreed increased racket head size was what made hitting top spin so easy and it was the use of exaggerated spin which was killing off the art of serve-and-volleying. "In the old days, with the restrictions of making a racket out of wood, a racket head nine inches wide was about the maximum you could make. "That stayed the same for about 100 years and was perfect. "You could still hit topspin ? nobody hit a backhand topspin passing shot like Rod Laver," Barrett added, referring to the Australian who won all four grand slam crowns in the same year in both 1962 and 1969. "The difference was you needed perfect timing then. Now, with the wider racket face, anybody can hit it." One solution could be for professionals to use modified, smaller rackets while amateurs could still use the larger models. "There is a history of this in other sports," guest Professor Howard Brody of the University of Pennsylvania said. "In the US in baseball there are different rules. Professionals are permitted to use only wooden bats while amateurs can use the more powerful aluminium versions." Source: http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,2584080a6562,00.html (Comment on this)
11:55a	Stretch to Avoid Injury Time to improve your stretching smarts Here's a look at some new ideas on this fitness must Tuesday, July 29, 2003 By Pohla Smith, Post-Gazette Staff Writer A cat wakes up after a long nap, and the first thing she does is stretch. Ditto a dog. When it comes to maintaining joint and muscle health, they're a lot smarter than most of their owners. Contrary to popular opinion, stretching isn't the exclusive purview of athletes and yoga buffs. It's for everybody Read More (Comment on this)
12:17p	USTA Tennis Participation Survey: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics? The August issue of Tennis Magazine has a report on "the largest study ever completed on recreational tennis". The study shows that there were 23.5 million Americans playing tennis at least once during a year. We have all heard the old adage of "Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics", but this is ridiculous. Someone in the tennis establishment must be very desperate, calling someone who has played tennis once in a year 'a tennis player'. Let me try an analogy. Around here, at the North Carolina coast, there are zillions of recreational fishermen. I am not one of them. Suppose I borrow a rod from a neighbor and mosey down to the pier, about ten minutes from our home, once a year, am I then a recreational fisherman?? But wait, it gets worse. The study also deals with 'frequent players'. What is a frequent player? Someone who plays 21 or more times in a year - less than two times per month! Give me a break! In my more active days, I considered four - five times per week - and mostly singles - was optimal for me, and that was true for most of the hundreds of recreational tennis players I knew. So, now we have five million 'active tennis players' who hit the courts less than twice in a month?? The report also states that the average age of 'frequent players' is rising. My guess is that if they looked at players who play at least two - three times per week, there would be a very dramatic increase in the average age. I still believe, as I said last time, that there are 'pockets' were tennis is played the way it used to be played, but this report really gives the picture of a sport in deep trouble. It is very sad. Kjell Petterson kjell@ec.rr.com (Comment on this)

<< Previous Day

2003/07/29 [Calendar]

Next Day >>