|
|
Tuesday, November 13th, 2007
|
2:20a
So anyway, this evening I'll be getting paperwork ready for the Appeal Process tomorrow. Not sure how it will go, considering last time this occurred I had to take it to the final stage of the administration processes. But you know that's life with a corrupted Government and corrupted Government Officials that haven't got any way of maintaining a position in society by other than creating abusive policies that break down the moral fibre of maintaining a community where all are treated with dignity and respect. You know it's all a fast.
Like today I read an article about Dr Rosenthal, or something similar who has developed a computer game that's supposed to assist drug addicts and works with a sound tone mechanism which I gather is meant to draw a suitable response from the drug addict. Problem is, more than likely it will just shift the addiction to another medium and therefore the Dr can now capitalize on the need to play computer games, as opposed to the need to take drugs. So in effect the addiction has moved from drug taking to playing computer games, and in effect the drug supplier loses his money chain supply, while the Doctor now increases his, be it by either selling the product or getting grants for development of the games. And at the end of the day it points to one thing and one thing only, people are addicted to money, they say there addicted to doing good, but when the mechanism of reward is money, which is a capitalists life blood and sense of social standing it becomes plainly evident that there's no difference between the drug addict or the Doctor, as they both crave something. The only major difference that one could cite is that the drug addict has a lower survival rate when engaged in his/her addiction, whereas the Doctor has the potential of living longer and thus maintaining his addiction for a longer period of time. I find that quite amusing, the Doctor of course would never admit to his addiction or most likely would never have his integrity questioned.
Another interesting Lipcrack insight.
(comment on this)
|
2:44a
you know I might wear a lab coat on stage...and punk it up...like a crazy lab tehco....lol...
(comment on this)
|
7:05a
okay, well just had a moment to go through the Authorized Review Officers claims of what I didn't do, which again I found so ridiculous because there's not one ounce of truth in them. In fact I attended every appointment and signed the agreement on the 18th, the fact that they tried to get me to sign a new agreement on the 20th is just bullshit, and I think any legal representative would question, why I was even in the office to sign an agreement that would be no different than the first...but anyway...just opened the notes they supplied, and more than likely will need to go through them....this morning at the cafe, I'm not sure how in depth it's going to go, but really if they don't take the first evidence that I offer them as evidence supporting the fact that the agency was not acting in an ethical manner, well, I'm just going to say, fine, I'm currently filling out business details for Legal Aid, and it can be either rescheduled, they can make a decision, or I'll just take it to the next level of process.
simple as that really.
(comment on this)
|
7:10a
and I can assure you by the final level of process, I'll have all my claims ready for legal action in the appropriate law court.
(comment on this)
|
|
|
|