May 6, 2012 Greek parliamentary election,karen millen dressesa majority of voters were against the austerity policies dictated by the European partners. To some observers, Greece would today divided between a pro-European vision assumes that the agreements on debt and an anti-protectionist European vision that karen millen salethreatens his place in the euro and the European Union.
A closer reading of the election result and that negotiations are under way, leads us to reconsider the ideological battle is engaged. The Greek debt crisis shook the traditional dividing lines left - right in the country.http://www.karenmillendressesmartuk.comThe new ideological divide rather oppose the parties accept as legitimate basis of the European project European liberal reformism, in the German version of ordo-liberalism, and political parties that advocate of statist and pro-active European social. Paradoxically,karen millen outletthe party carrying the idea of a European socio-economic solidarity that are perceived to be anti-European.
The Greek socialist party PASOK, once the crisis is installed, has gradually assumed all the requirements that resulted from the austerity demanded by the EU and the IMF. PASOK has initiated policies wage and tax socially painful. He made efforts, which have partly failed despite the support of the European technocracy, to implement economic reforms of liberal orthodoxy deemed necessary (reducing the size of the Greek state, privatization of public enterprises , wage flexibility by reforming the labor market, fiscal and administrative facilitation of foreign investment flows etc..). This party, historically rooted in the social democratic tradition, has ruled the country from 2009 to 2011 by conveying a vision of the problem Economist Greek debt. In a similar way, karen millen outlet the conservative New Democracy abandoned at the end of 2011 their position right populist anti-austerity and co-governed the country with PASOK until May 2012 under the auspices of L. Papademos.
These two political, emblematic of the Greek two-party since the beginning of the Metapoliteusis in 1974, are now ex-major parties. It is precisely their long implementation and taking of interest in the institutions and services of the Greek state has become the main obstacle to any attempt at administrative streamlining. In response, the European Commission created a task force Greece to provide technical assistance in this matter.
Without doubt, the election result brings these parties to qualify their speech accepting the one hand, a renegotiation of the second marginal austerity plan and, on the other, karen millen sale the reinforcement of a policy of further growth. This does not change their commitment to the current approach to crisis management. The notion that Greece can only follow the roadmap of neoliberal reformism is also shared by the extra-parliamentary parties liberals "Drasi" and "Democratic Coalition", which again more in the Anglo-Saxon tradition. The "Democratic Coalition" is currently negotiating with the New Democracy to form a single platform.
This blend of ideologically heterogeneous parties is in a minority position in the face of anti-liberal and leftist parties, however, pro-European. There are the left-wing radical who saw Suriza quadruple strength of new parties and dissident moderate left, as the Democratic Left and the extra-parliamentary party center-left Social Pact. In the same vein anti-austerity, there is also the dissenting party right Independent People Greeks. If the first mark their opposition to austerity policies focusing on the issue of tax and social justice, the latter gives the scoop on issues of security and national integrity.
Political landscape in this highly fragmented, new power relations develop. The electoral earthquake in Greece draws lines of fracture which remain emblematic of the Europeanization of ideological conflicts. The growth of the forces of pro-European left anti-austerity in Greece is participating in a larger movement that should not be regarded as "heretical". It ultimately strengthens the bargaining power of political movements and parties in the partner countries who wish to further integration.
The European project has built on the social liberalism of Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman. To what extent this ideological framework can ensure the viability of the project now? After the cohesion policy of the 1980s Jacques Delors, President Holland arrives to offer an updated version of the European Social Liberal reformism: create a policy of growth based on productive investment. This option requires especially strengthening the role of European economic institutions (European Central Bank, European Investment Bank, European Financial Stability Font) and the European Commission, but also the creation of other, karen millen dresses as a European Treasury. This agenda proposed by the ruling elites will, in the best case, caused the development of a well-defined sectoral federalism. It is beyond any European policies of social redistribution. Federalism, indeed executive, may be summarized in three points: the enhanced role of the European technocracy, the use of the intergovernmental policy and economic development of a formal European parliamentarism.
Given this limited reformism, European citizens may be involved in opening a new account. A growing number of voters becomes aware of the institutional and political failure of the EU. On the European political area, the movement that project a vision of solidarity in Europe are on the rise. The emergence of a mature citizen request claiming federalism social, fiscal and democratic European may be far less than we think.
|© 2002-2008. Blurty Journal. All rights reserved.|