 |
|||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|||||||||||
 |
 |
||||||||||||
Total Score: (69/100) 0-19 Worst Journal Ever 20-29 Horrible 30-39 Really Awful 40-49 Awful 50-59 Not Too Good 60-65 So So 66-75 Average 76-80 Cool 81-84 Good 85-89 Very Good 90-94 Excellent 95-99 Elite 100 Extremely Elite (Perfect) Yep. Main Intelligence: (6/10) In the earlier entries, she shows a lot of deep thought and intriguing emotion…but as it wears on, it falls into a pattern of the run-of-the-mill boy-crazy teeny-bopper category. Lots of gross misspellings, although she seems to have an extensive vocabulary. Emotional Value: (8/10) She speaks of her emotion often, predominantly sadness or frustration. Lost points for being monotonous, hardly ever moving away from her decidedly “emo” behavior. Uses moods. I’ve always liked the hamsters, so…points for that! Individuality (6/10) You laugh because I’m different, I laugh because you’re all the same….emo is not original, when half the nation does it. Says a few off the wall things…like I said, everyday teenage dramas. Customization: (7/10) Has changed the settings and color, all works well together. Easy to read, but shows no knowledge of HTML whatsoever…she’s an early adopter, so I expected more out of the layout. She appears to have a customized icon, so, props for that. Courtesy and grammar (7/10) I hate spelling errors!!! Most are obviously mistakes from typing too quickly, I don’t think she re-reads what she’s typed. Lots of quizzes that could have been cut. Responds to comments. Sub Categories Bio: (3/5) Well...the bio does give a good impression of her. She describes what she looks like, and that she is emo, which is about all that you can draw from her journal. Doesn’t particularly make me want to read it…but there is a lot of writing there, so at least she spent some time on it. User Pics: (5/5) Good pics that match. What more can I say? Contactability: (4/5) Has a website and an AIM screen name…not terribly stalkable, but if you were truly dedicated, you could get her! Comments enabled. Quantity: (5/5) Frequent entries that usually don’t lag on more than they should. Explains long absences, appears to be pretty dedicated to her journal. Blurty Involvement: (4/5) 49 interests listed, is a member of four communities. Likes and responds to comments. Spent some time on their bio, although no HTML. Journal Style Impression: (3/5) This person doesn’t seem terribly interesting or original. I don’t know if I would befriend this person…melodrama isn’t a big attraction. Sense of Humour: (1/5) The only thing I found amusing about this journal is at one point she was known to say “THANK ALLAH” which made me smile. That’s it. Style (2/5) The entries fit together well, and the overall theme is how we all should pity her, the poor kicked puppy nobody loved. Fourty seven entries, and nothing changed. Her writing style is consistent to that of one her age, which I am presuming is quite young (I think at one point she mentioned not being in high school). Openness: (5/5) She is very open about what she is feeling, entries are public, and she’ll say it like it is…even if what it is, is terribly uninteresting. Bonus: (3/5) Nothing spectacular. Total Score: (69/100) 0-19 Worst Journal Ever 20-29 Horrible 30-39 Really Awful 40-49 Awful 50-59 Not Too Good 60-65 So So 66-75 Average 76-80 Cool 81-84 Good 85-89 Very Good 90-94 Excellent 95-99 Elite 100 Extremely Elite (Perfect) |
| © 2002-2008. Blurty Journal. All rights reserved. |