Create Journals
Update Journals

Journals
Find Users
Random

Read
Search
Create New

Communities
Latest News
How to Use

Support
Privacy
T.O.S.

Legal
Username:
Password:

teh alex (erekose) wrote,
@ 2004-03-07 18:58:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Add to Topic Directory  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

    Current mood: bored
    Current music:Authority Zero-Everyday

    What's this? An update?!
    Yes, I am actually updating. i would have done it sooner, but nothing at all happened this weekend. well, i take that back, today, sunday, i went to a chruch to hear a guy named Phillip Johnson talk about God and evolution. now this in itself, taught me nothnig new, i pretty much knew everything that the guy was saying, i was just a bit amazed at him for a few reasons though. here they are..
    a. the guy doesnt know how to answer question, he just knows how to talk in circles until he either hits the subject, or the other person passes out.
    b. he chooses to not addres carbon dating and radiometrics. now you might be thinking, so what? well, the thing is, in choosing to not address these topics, he puts a HUGE hole into his argument. it really annoyed the crapo out of me that the wouldnt address this, and here was his reason..."i choose not to address topics in which we will get deadlocked during a debate." now don't get me wrong, but this guy didn't know how to debate at all, I know how to debate better than he does, and i'm an art major. carbon dating and radiometrics are a vaiable topic in the debate between creation and evolution, and when it is not address, then you miss half the point.
    c. this guy talked in circles the entire time. after you hear the same thing four time in a row, only with fifteen minutes between them, you get really bored....i drew PLAID DESIGNS on my paper. Plaid sucks.
    d. the man claimed to be an intellectual, and while i credit him for pioneering the movement he's in, he doesnt seem to be particularly bright in person. he based his entire argument on definitions of words, which is good, but he barely addressed the importance of scientific fact, or the lack thereof in evolution.

    yeah, the guys one good point:
    There is no way, scientifically, that life could have started the way the darwinists say it did, and bacteria are less harmed by penicillin these days.......yeah.



(Post a new comment)


italian_sausage
2004-03-09 23:05 (link)
You would never find me at one of those things.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Post a new comment)

© 2002-2008. Blurty Journal. All rights reserved.