fasfas (aaaqqq111) wrote, @ 2012-02-29 14:32:00

the Confucian culture, the only
1980s: Gan Yang in the eyes of the Confucian
of: Liu Dong's super
80, so that today, four, five-year-old heart charmed cherished times in our memory, it was a warm, beauty, poetic, and the blooming years of youth, though still no shortage of so much suffering, sorrow and poverty. For us, it is also a distant and closer to that distant era. that it is because it looks like already ethereal subtlety beyond the catch,Coach Purses, it is after an interval of a whole era (1990s) today. proximate said it, because it appeared from time to time in our dreams, from time to time, affect the road of our present thinking.
in the ideological dimension, the impact of the 1980s can be described as enormous and profound. In a sense, today's ideological character and ideological discourse basic is the time to appear and gradually formed the ideological pattern is rolled out since the 1980s (although it had long been the origin) and change as ideological character,coach outlet, Mr. Gan Yang is then to one of the today, but also stirred up some thinking articles of the 1980s article explore the ideas of the time dynamic and associated with a certain ideology today. chose the topic of Confucianism, on top of it still in the focus of intellectual concern, because Gan Yang's thinking and Confucianism dynamic there are some at
standing on the perspective of today, we select Gan Yang was two thinking to be discussed. First, he believes does not exist the so-called He said many scholars which promotes and incites the face of all history and time in shaping the constantly changing, every generation necessarily according to their own requirements to re-shape the amendments to change the face of Confucius and Confucianism: Han Dynasty the Zhongshu the Confucius Song there are Ming Zhu Xi, Confucius, the late Qing Dynasty Kang Youwei Confucius, the May Fourth generation of Lu Xun, Hu Shi, Confucius, today there are hou Confucius hh (61) the existence of the original appearance of Confucianism is indeed in the early 1980s (forward can be be traced back to the 1930s) historians topic of discussion today, It seems that the problem solution is actually very complex,Coach Kristin, this relates to the historical epistemology of objectivism and subjectivism in the long-standing controversy in this we have no time to commence, but from the knowledge of history and the basic logic of it, certainly the face of Confucianism and all changes, to deny the existence of a fixed and inalienable Confucianism is indeed Calvary can even say that is strange. give the simplest example, Sima Qian Han Confucian eyes of the world system analyzer method, the system of vertical Confucius very different from the Han Confucians in the eyes of Confucius, not thousands of people side, Confucius saying reduction of great changes and variations, Confucianism (other factions too) look more natural, however, if it invariably touches people strange, therefore, impossible to find an original Confucian outlook. Today, Gan Yang 20 years ago, the observation is quite profound and valuable.
interesting, Gan Yang criticized the pursuit of Confucianism original appearance of the ideological tendency not only did not stop, but today there are even further intensified development. For example, some commentators believe that not only the existence of the true Confucianism, and Confucianism is Jesus Christ the same often is often Road. For example, some commentators not only that the existence of this really Confucianism, and that he Confucianism is this the true Confucianism, Confucianism of others are an offshoot of the distal or heresy. right or wrong here was not difficult to judge, is definitely worth considering why this year Gan Yang criticized falsehood tendency can also become very popular today, a great market in my opinion, both with the overall idea of ​​the level of our society is more low relevant, but also with the ideological environment is relatively loose, and level of tolerance of people, but also caused some market-oriented the needs of some ; the basic spirit of the Chinese culture. secondary, subordinate elements, in our opinion, the only way to really overcome the negative even reactionary role played by the Confucian culture, the only way to truly l Everbright Chinese culture the traditional r ). his theoretical premise here is that since May Fourth, we are creating a new cultural system, China's Confucian culture as the main or basic spirit of the pre-modern cultures there are differences in the nature, the social form level This is the pre-modern to Modernity, page) Also, because the integrity of the social structure and organic, this change is complete, the pre-modern culture can only become a modern cultural system modification and utilization of materials, can not become the dominant force. Therefore, Confucian culture can not be modern and become the subject and the basic spirit of Chinese culture.
Gan Yang theory is the basic starting point is the history of mankind can be divided into traditional and modern society, although expressed in different, but the starting point of Marxism, liberalism, and many other home school to observe the basic consensus of human history. of course, there are also many criticisms and controversies, but in my opinion not enough to overturn the consensus. This is because, in the long history of human and does show a very complex phenomena and conditions, if the complexity of the phenomenon in the vast expanse of space and time, then to distinguish, in the time dimension, divided into two stages is the most simple and most basic method, but also the other division and analysis of the history of mankind just by manual production and machinery production as the boundary is divided into two phases. different social forms because of the inherent organic nature of human society, no doubt, will naturally formed on top of the manual production and mechanical production. In other words, the above in a different mode of production vastly different political systems and cultural systems in the logic of this recognition of the dominant culture of the traditional social system different from the modern social and cultural systems in nature and type of, and thus can not be dominant in the modern cultural system is a matter of course . are therefore, Gan Yang deny Confucianism can continue to be the basic spirit of the modern Chinese culture is established.
interesting in the contemporary intellectual, not only would people still insist that Confucianism is the basic spirit of the Chinese culture,Coach Crossbody, and even people tend to think that Confucianism or Confucian Chinese culture, Chinese culture is Confucianism or Confucianism, implying that the construction of our current culture is Chinese culture, were razed to change the summer problems have been quite clear in the fact that level of Chinese culture in a traditional society at least, including Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, Confucianism dominate (such as the ideological sphere) only in certain areas, Confucianism or Confucian culture in modern society only as some of the fragments or components exist in modern Chinese culture as a whole being, even in the foreseeable future society, we do not see too much possibility of Confucianism became the dominant force in, unless forcibly future of Chinese culture generalization collectively referred to as the People often violated in real life and thought of convention in the sense that arbitrarily use some of the concepts, thus leading to confusion and confusion some theory, some theoretical differences is actually produced. , these commentators literally each other provisions of Confucianism and Chinese culture, which led to Confucianism is the basic spirit of the Chinese culture and even the Chinese culture, of course, does not make sense and interpretation efforts.
intellectual debate about Confucianism is quite intense in the 1980s, Gan Yang's thinking was classified as today's perspective, these reflections may contain some of the more rough, but some points there are still some reason is worth noting that he had criticized some of the ideological phenomenon until today still appear even the formation of some kind of climate for review of these ideas can make us a better understanding of the association of the 1980s and the Chinese thought, better design our future Pathways of Thought.
dispute, page = 1